Search for: "TransUnion Risk"
Results 1 - 20
of 169
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2021, 9:43 am
The Court says that a risk of future harm may support standing to seek injunctive relief, but a risk of future harm is not sufficient to satisfy standing in a suit for damages. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 1:54 pm
” The cases also serve as examples of courts rejecting claims based on risks of future harm, following TransUnion. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 5:46 am
Today Fastcase is announcing the addition of speciailized risk data from Trans Union’s alternative, non-credit, public records product. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 7:31 am
However, the court also made clear that conclusory allegations of intent to return and proximity are not enough in light of TransUnion’s holdings that plaintiffs must establish a “material risk of future harm” that is “sufficiently imminent and substantial” to pursue forward-looking injunctive relief. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 8:11 am
Supreme Court explained in TransUnion is required for standing. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 7:40 am
It also reported that TransUnion is working on its own BNPL credit reporting service. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 5:45 am
Fastcase members will have the opportunity to access TransUnion’s specialized risk data as part of its alternative, non-credit and public record solution. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 8:47 am
More generally, this case is a cautionary tale about the risks of using layered notices. [read post]
30 Mar 2021, 5:50 pm
” And Alison Frankel’s “On the Case” from Thomson Reuters News & Insight has a post titled “In TransUnion class action arguments, SCOTUS struggles to define ‘material risk. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 5:00 am
Although the latter class members faced a risk of injury—their reputations could have been injured if TransUnion had sent their reports to third parties—that risk could not satisfy Article III. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 10:29 am
Supreme Court ruled last week in TransUnion, LLC. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 8:44 am
TransUnion LLC v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 10:23 am
The risk of future harm, the Court wrote, was too speculative and unproven because there was no evidence that many of this group of class members were even aware that TransUnion had identified them as a potential match to the OFAC list. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 8:40 am
The US Supreme Court heard oral arguments Tuesday in the class action certification case of TransUnion LLC v. [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 6:32 am
In TransUnion LLC v. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 9:27 am
In TransUnion, the Supreme Court held that “mere risk of future harm” regarding a credit alert was not sufficiently concrete to satisfy the Constitutional standing requirements. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 4:29 pm
Case Background Defendant TransUnion prepared a credit report on Plaintiff. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 7:09 pm
Robins (2016) and TransUnion v. [read post]
10 Mar 2021, 10:15 am
“When users lose control of their data, or the correctness of their data is compromised, those are serious harms in and of themselves, and they put users at tremendous risk,” said EFF Senior Staff Attorney Adam Schwartz. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 12:13 pm
Today’s post looks at standing and the recent US Supreme Court decision in Transunion v. [read post]
